Messages in this thread | | | Date | Mon, 18 May 2009 10:36:09 +0900 | Subject | Re: Where do we stand with the Xen patches? | From | FUJITA Tomonori <> |
| |
On Thu, 14 May 2009 12:54:54 -0700 Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@goop.org> wrote:
> Hi Ingo, > > Over the last week or so, I've set out pull requests for the following > branches in git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/jeremy/xen.git : > > for-ingo/xen/dom0/core > > You made two comments about the first post of this set: > > 1. The // comments in the mtrr code. Now fixed. > 2. A query about when Xen can support PAT. In progress; when its > done, we can remove the unconditional PAT disable. > > for-ingo/xen/dom0/pci > for-ingo/xen/dom0/swiotlb > > Updated with Joerg Roedel, FUJITA Tomonori and Matthew Wilcox's > comments, Acked-by and Reviewed-bys as appropriate.
The original code added dom0-specific dma mapping stuff in the generic place, which is completely wrong. I asked you to move the hacky stuff to Xen-specific code and ack'ed the patchset.
But as I said again and again, the dom0 changes to the generic dma mapipng code is really ugly and I don't like them at all. I didn't ack'ed such changes.
| |