Messages in this thread | | | Date | Fri, 15 May 2009 13:58:30 -0400 (EDT) | From | Christoph Lameter <> | Subject | Re: Misleading OOM messages |
| |
On Thu, 14 May 2009, David Rientjes wrote:
> > To me it at least adds the fact that more should be made *available* and > > not just that you're out of it. So, definitely not perfect, but better > > than "out". > > > > I think "no allowable memory" followed by information on what is and is > not allowed in that specific context would remove any ambiguity.
Useful information to have. If a NUMA or cgroup restriction caused the failure then we should print that out.
| |