lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2009]   [May]   [13]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
From
Date
Subjectpm-susend on 2.6.30-rc5
When trying suspend on 2.6.30-rc5 I get the following WARN and also
cannot use my write to my file system. I cannot even reboot:

mcgrof@pogo ~ $ sudo reboot
sudo: unable to execute /sbin/reboot: Success
mcgrof@pogo ~ $ echo $?
127

Granted, I've never tried to suspend on this box, its a development
desktop, but still think you'd like to know about it. The actual WARN
in question is:

/* Warning on suspend means the RTC alarm period needs to be
* larger -- the system was sooo slooowwww to suspend that the
* alarm (should have) fired before the system went to sleep!
*
* Warning on either suspend or resume also means the system
* has some performance issues. The stack dump of a WARN_ON
* is more likely to get the right attention than a printk...
*/
WARN(msec > (TEST_SUSPEND_SECONDS * 1000), "Component: %s\n", label);

But what is surprising is this is a decent desktop: AMD Phenom(tm)
9750 Quad-Core Processor with 8 GB RAM. not sure what to make out of
this WARN then or what to do.

The hard drive (sdb) / ext3 issues seem separate. Below I paste the
WARN and some sda/ext3 errors.

For complete logs:

http://bombadil.infradead.org/~mcgrof/logs/2.6.30-rc5/bootup.log
http://bombadil.infradead.org/~mcgrof/logs/2.6.30-rc5/suspend.log
http://bombadil.infradead.org/~mcgrof/logs/2.6.30-rc5/resume.log
http://bombadil.infradead.org/~mcgrof/logs/2.6.30-rc5/system-info.log

I've booted with nmi_watchdog=1 (which doesn't work see bug #12774)
and apic=debug.

[1] http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12774

In suspend.log you'll find a cfg80211 related lockdep warning -- I am
testing WoW code but I do not believe the lockdep issue is related to
that code so that should be reproducible without ithe WoW stuff I
have. Anyway if anyone has an idea how to fix this issue that the WARN
complains about please let me know. The sdb/ext3 issues are a little
more concerning. Not like I care but others using similar systems and
for whatever reason they suspend (I guess to save power at home on a
power hog machine) may.

[ 202.381160] ------------[ cut here ]------------
[ 202.381162] WARNING: at kernel/power/main.c:176
suspend_test_finish+0x7c/0x80()
[ 202.381164] Hardware name: System Product Name
[ 202.381165] Component: resume devices
[ 202.381166] Modules linked in: ipv6 cpufreq_ondemand powernow_k8
freq_table binfmt_misc loop dm_multipath scsi
_dh arc4 ecb ath9k mac80211 af_packet rfkill led_class ath sr_mod
cdrom cfg80211 shpchp evdev evbug usbhid psmous
e e1000 i2c_nforce2 pci_hotplug hid pata_amd i2c_core processor pcspkr
serio_raw sg floppy wmi button thermal dm_
snapshot dm_zero dm_mirror dm_region_hash dm_log dm_mod ahci
ata_generic pata_acpi libata sd_mod scsi_mod crc_t10
dif ext3 jbd mbcache uhci_hcd ohci_hcd ehci_hcd usbcore [last
unloaded: scsi_wait_scan]
[ 202.381205] Pid: 3879, comm: pm-suspend Not tainted 2.6.30-rc5-wl #28
[ 202.381207] Call Trace:
[ 202.381214] [<ffffffff8023f520>] warn_slowpath_fmt+0xd0/0x120
[ 202.381219] [<ffffffff80560380>] ? _spin_unlock+0x30/0x60
[ 202.381222] [<ffffffff802402c1>] ? vprintk+0x2f1/0x490
[ 202.381226] [<ffffffff8048c522>] ? device_resume+0x312/0x450
[ 202.381230] [<ffffffff8055c370>] ? printk+0x67/0x6f
[ 202.381234] [<ffffffff8026b37d>] ? trace_hardirqs_on+0xd/0x10
[ 202.381237] [<ffffffff8055dbb9>] ? mutex_unlock+0x9/0x10
[ 202.381239] [<ffffffff8048c59e>] ? device_resume+0x38e/0x450
[ 202.381242] [<ffffffff8027864c>] suspend_test_finish+0x7c/0x80
[ 202.381245] [<ffffffff8027871f>] suspend_devices_and_enter+0xaf/0x240
[ 202.381247] [<ffffffff80278a46>] enter_state+0x166/0x1e0
[ 202.381250] [<ffffffff80278b7a>] state_store+0xba/0x100
[ 202.381254] [<ffffffff803f5537>] kobj_attr_store+0x17/0x20
[ 202.381258] [<ffffffff8033f96a>] sysfs_write_file+0xca/0x140
[ 202.381262] [<ffffffff802ebbdb>] vfs_write+0xcb/0x190
[ 202.381264] [<ffffffff802ebd90>] sys_write+0x50/0x90
[ 202.381268] [<ffffffff8020bf6b>] system_call_fastpath+0x16/0x1b
[ 202.381270] ---[ end trace 3b85c8c444ddfc72 ]---
[ 202.401320] PM: Finishing wakeup.
[ 202.401367] Restarting tasks ... done.
[ 202.484982] sd 2:0:0:0: [sdb] Unhandled error code
[ 202.485043] sd 2:0:0:0: [sdb] Result: hostbyte=DID_BAD_TARGET
driverbyte=DRIVER_OK
[ 202.485141] end_request: I/O error, dev sdb, sector 16180793
[ 202.485227] sd 2:0:0:0: [sdb] Unhandled error code
[ 202.485277] sd 2:0:0:0: [sdb] Result: hostbyte=DID_BAD_TARGET
driverbyte=DRIVER_OK
[ 202.485372] end_request: I/O error, dev sdb, sector 16180793
[ 202.969259] sd 2:0:0:0: [sdb] Unhandled error code
[ 202.969317] sd 2:0:0:0: [sdb] Result: hostbyte=DID_BAD_TARGET
driverbyte=DRIVER_OK
[ 202.969419] end_request: I/O error, dev sdb, sector 144323017
[ 202.969497] EXT3-fs error (device dm-0): ext3_get_inode_loc: unable
to read inode block - inode=4505287, block
=17990126
[ 202.969717] sd 2:0:0:0: [sdb] Unhandled error code
[ 202.969769] sd 2:0:0:0: [sdb] Result: hostbyte=DID_BAD_TARGET
driverbyte=DRIVER_OK
[ 202.969867] end_request: I/O error, dev sdb, sector 402009
[ 202.969924] Buffer I/O error on device dm-0, logical block 0
[ 202.969978] lost page write due to I/O error on dm-0
[ 207.400942] sd 2:0:0:0: [sdb] Unhandled error code
[ 207.401003] sd 2:0:0:0: [sdb] Result: hostbyte=DID_BAD_TARGET
driverbyte=DRIVER_OK
[ 207.401104] end_request: I/O error, dev sdb, sector 235923705
[ 207.401165] Buffer I/O error on device dm-0, logical block 29440212
[ 207.401220] lost page write due to I/O error on dm-0
[ 207.401298] sd 2:0:0:0: [sdb] Unhandled error code
[ 207.401350] sd 2:0:0:0: [sdb] Result: hostbyte=DID_BAD_TARGET
driverbyte=DRIVER_OK
[ 207.401454] end_request: I/O error, dev sdb, sector 235976561
[ 207.401518] Buffer I/O error on device dm-0, logical block 29446819


\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2009-05-14 03:45    [W:0.037 / U:0.280 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site