[lkml]   [2009]   [May]   [12]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
    SubjectRe: [PATCH -tip] x86: cpu/proc.c adding extended_cpuid_level for /proc/cpuinfo

    On Tue, May 12, 2009 at 09:40:40AM -0700, H. Peter Anvin wrote:
    > Borislav Petkov wrote:
    > >>>
    > >> why we need cpuid_level ?
    > >
    > > It is already visible in userspace. I think you've got an answer to a
    > > very similar question already:
    > >
    > >
    > >
    > extended_cpuid_level should be motivated, but probably does make sense.

    I still fail to see the need for adding that to /proc/cpuinfo,
    especially if you can do the whole exercise from userspace. But I'm sure
    you have a good example.

    > It hardly "completes" /proc/cpuinfo; especially if you consider that
    > there are at least three additional ranges in wide use (two used by a
    > single vendor only, and the third by virtualization software.)

    I think both vendors use the two ranges :-o).


    Operating | Advanced Micro Devices GmbH
    System | Karl-Hammerschmidt-Str. 34, 85609 Dornach b. München, Germany
    Research | Geschäftsführer: Thomas M. McCoy, Giuliano Meroni
    Center | Sitz: Dornach, Gemeinde Aschheim, Landkreis München
    (OSRC) | Registergericht München, HRB Nr. 43632

    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to
    More majordomo info at
    Please read the FAQ at

     \ /
      Last update: 2009-05-12 20:17    [W:0.023 / U:6.304 seconds]
    ©2003-2017 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site