Messages in this thread | | | Date | Tue, 12 May 2009 16:24:45 +1000 | From | Paul Mackerras <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH 3/5] perf_counter: rework ioctl()s |
| |
Peter Zijlstra writes:
> Thanks, I missed that little detail. > > Do we still want the new ioctl iteration flag?
Not sure; it might be useful sometimes, I guess. We do need to clear up the confusion about whether one does ioctl(fd, ..., flag) or ioctl(fd, ..., &flag), and if the former we shouldn't be using _IOW, as Arnd pointed out.
Paul.
| |