[lkml]   [2009]   [May]   [1]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: [PATCH] driver-core: devtmpfs - driver core maintained /dev tmpfs
On Fri, May 1, 2009 at 21:26, Andrew Morton <> wrote:
> On Fri, 1 May 2009 13:16:22 +0200
> Kay Sievers <> wrote:
>> On Fri, May 1, 2009 at 07:29, Andrew Morton <> wrote:
>> > dev->type->nodename() might have failed due to -ENOMEM, in which case
>> > it seems wrong to assume that it returned NULL for <whatever reason you
>> > thought it might want to return NULL>.
>> >
>> > It's all a bit confused.
>> This logic is only for providing a custom name hint. Only a few
>> devices need that at all. If the allocation fails, the default name
>> will be used, not the custom name.
> But that's bad, isn't it?  It means that the kernel will come up with
> one name if the memory allocation succeeded, and a different name if
> the allocation failed.

Yeah, sure, it's bad. But I think we have pretty much lost anyway, if
we run into oom at this stage.

What should we do instead? If we, for some reason, can not get a
possible custom name?

To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2009-05-02 00:03    [W:0.115 / U:1.596 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site