lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2009]   [Apr]   [9]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
SubjectRe: [RFC] Static/Runtime CPU/IO bound scheduling polices based on CPU(s) to support complete spectrum of tasks
From
Date
On Thu, 2009-04-09 at 15:56 +0530, Jaswinder Singh Rajput wrote:
> On Tue, 2009-04-07 at 17:02 +0530, Jaswinder Singh Rajput wrote:
> > On Tue, 2009-04-07 at 12:58 +0200, Andi Kleen wrote:
> > > On Tue, Apr 07, 2009 at 03:55:31PM +0530, Jaswinder Singh Rajput wrote:
> > > > I am planning to prepare the followings:
> > >
> > > This seems all quite vague. Perhaps it would be good if you started
> > > with a clear definition what problem you're trying to solve.
> > >
> >
>
> I do not surprise, if this approach seems vague to many developers
> because this is many years ahead of time.

Yes, or not.

For partitioning we have cpusets, for scheduler policies we have
sched_setscheduler().

The only thing we do not have are deadline schedulers, but people are
working on that -- its a rather complex piece of work.

The rest of you babbling is hand-waving about heuristics.


\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2009-04-09 13:41    [W:0.039 / U:0.580 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site