Messages in this thread | | | Subject | Re: [RFC] Static/Runtime CPU/IO bound scheduling polices based on CPU(s) to support complete spectrum of tasks | From | Peter Zijlstra <> | Date | Thu, 09 Apr 2009 13:38:19 +0200 |
| |
On Thu, 2009-04-09 at 15:56 +0530, Jaswinder Singh Rajput wrote: > On Tue, 2009-04-07 at 17:02 +0530, Jaswinder Singh Rajput wrote: > > On Tue, 2009-04-07 at 12:58 +0200, Andi Kleen wrote: > > > On Tue, Apr 07, 2009 at 03:55:31PM +0530, Jaswinder Singh Rajput wrote: > > > > I am planning to prepare the followings: > > > > > > This seems all quite vague. Perhaps it would be good if you started > > > with a clear definition what problem you're trying to solve. > > > > > > > I do not surprise, if this approach seems vague to many developers > because this is many years ahead of time.
Yes, or not.
For partitioning we have cpusets, for scheduler policies we have sched_setscheduler().
The only thing we do not have are deadline schedulers, but people are working on that -- its a rather complex piece of work.
The rest of you babbling is hand-waving about heuristics.
| |