| Subject | Re: [PATCH] Allow preemption during lazy mmu updates | From | Peter Zijlstra <> | Date | Wed, 08 Apr 2009 17:11:52 +0200 |
| |
On Wed, 2009-04-08 at 16:54 +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote: > > > kernel/sched.c | 2 - > > Needs the ack of ... oh, never mind - this one is fine i guess ;-)
Ah, about that. This new preemption hook has slightly different requirements than the current preempt-notifiers have (hence the new hook), I was wondering if KVM (afaik currently the only preempt-notifier consumer) could live with these requirements.
That is, could these be merged?
|