Messages in this thread | | | From | Kumar Gala <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH 5/7] swiotlb: (re)Create swiotlb_unmap_single | Date | Wed, 8 Apr 2009 09:10:38 -0500 |
| |
>>> >>> the patches came right in the merge window - that's too late for >>> IOMMU bits, the patch cutoff is generally the beginning of the merge >>> window. (Which was on March 23 in this window) >> >> Fair. >> >>> But i can queue them up in the .31 queue if it has all the Acks from >>> you folks. Becky, mind resending the latest version, with all the >>> acks in place? >> >> I can do this in Becky's abscense this week. The only "acks" I've >> seen are from FUJITA Tomonori. > > _your_ ack (or signoff) counts too - so to me it's plural :-)
I've added my signoff :)
>> Can we ask there be a unique swiotlb branch in your tree to make >> it easier for us to continue additional swiotlb work as well as >> arch specific work. > > yes - tip:core/iommu is already distinct from tip:x86/iommu and is > intended for such more generic patches. It has no patches pending > right now (it just got all merged upstream) - so please use an > upstream base - 2.6.30-rc1 would be a good starting point.
Just reposted v3 based on 2.6.30-rc1
- k
| |