lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2009]   [Apr]   [8]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH 5/7] swiotlb: (re)Create swiotlb_unmap_single
Date
>>>
>>> the patches came right in the merge window - that's too late for
>>> IOMMU bits, the patch cutoff is generally the beginning of the merge
>>> window. (Which was on March 23 in this window)
>>
>> Fair.
>>
>>> But i can queue them up in the .31 queue if it has all the Acks from
>>> you folks. Becky, mind resending the latest version, with all the
>>> acks in place?
>>
>> I can do this in Becky's abscense this week. The only "acks" I've
>> seen are from FUJITA Tomonori.
>
> _your_ ack (or signoff) counts too - so to me it's plural :-)

I've added my signoff :)

>> Can we ask there be a unique swiotlb branch in your tree to make
>> it easier for us to continue additional swiotlb work as well as
>> arch specific work.
>
> yes - tip:core/iommu is already distinct from tip:x86/iommu and is
> intended for such more generic patches. It has no patches pending
> right now (it just got all merged upstream) - so please use an
> upstream base - 2.6.30-rc1 would be a good starting point.

Just reposted v3 based on 2.6.30-rc1

- k


\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2009-04-08 16:19    [W:1.491 / U:0.304 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site