lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2009]   [Apr]   [5]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
Patch in this message
/
From
Subject[2.6.29] Fix for enabling branch profiling makes sparse unusable
Date
One of the changes between kernels 2.6.28 and 2.6.29 is that a branch profiler
has been added for if() statements. Unfortunately this patch makes the sparse
output unusable with CONFIG_TRACE_BRANCH_PROFILING=y: when branch profiling is
enabled, sparse prints so much false positives that the real issues are no
longer visible. This behavior can be reproduced as follows:
* enable CONFIG_TRACE_BRANCH_PROFILING, e.g. by running make allyesconfig or
make allmodconfig.
* run make C=2

Result: a huge number of the following sparse warnings.
...
include/linux/cpumask.h:547:2: warning: symbol '______r' shadows an earlier one
include/linux/cpumask.h:547:2: originally declared here
...

The patch below fixes this by disabling branch profiling while analyzing the
kernel code with sparse.

See also:
* http://lkml.org/lkml/2008/11/21/18
* http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12925

Signed-off-by: Bart Van Assche <bart.vanassche@gmail.com>

--- orig/linux-2.6.29/include/linux/compiler.h 2009-03-23 19:12:14.000000000 -0400
+++ linux-2.6.29/include/linux/compiler.h 2009-03-24 08:46:46.000000000 -0400
@@ -75,7 +75,8 @@ struct ftrace_branch_data {
* Note: DISABLE_BRANCH_PROFILING can be used by special lowlevel code
* to disable branch tracing on a per file basis.
*/
-#if defined(CONFIG_TRACE_BRANCH_PROFILING) && !defined(DISABLE_BRANCH_PROFILING)
+#if defined(CONFIG_TRACE_BRANCH_PROFILING) \
+ && !defined(DISABLE_BRANCH_PROFILING) && !defined(__CHECKER__)
void ftrace_likely_update(struct ftrace_branch_data *f, int val, int expect);

#define likely_notrace(x) __builtin_expect(!!(x), 1)

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2009-04-05 16:51    [W:0.086 / U:2.588 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site