lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2009]   [Apr]   [4]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [GIT PULL] Ext3 latency fixes


On Sat, 4 Apr 2009, Theodore Tso wrote:
>
> Using ext3 data=writeback, your "write big (2GB) file and sync" as the
> background workload, and fsync-tester, I was able to reduce the
> latency down to under 1 second...

Hmm. I can certainly see a very noticeable improvement.

I could still see 1-2s fsync() delays for my MUA test (and seem to have
seen a 4s one once too). But most were all 'quite noticeable stutters',
and very seldom do they go into the 'ooh, that's really painful' stage.

And yes, anticipatory seems to be quite noticeably better than cfq here.
With cfq I got a few two-second delays on 'ftruncate()' too (probably
because of your new serialization code?), and the longest fsync() delay
was over 7 seconds. That was definitely solidly in the "painful" category.

(Jens - my test-case is not the exact same fsycn() test that Ted uses:
it's really just me being in my MUA editing an email, and doing that

while : ; do time sh -c "dd if=/dev/zero of=bigfile bs=8M count=256 ; sync; rm bigfile"; done

in another window. My MUA does these save-files ever minute or so, and
does a 'fsync()' after writing that (small) file. If the fsync() takes
more than half a second, I can definitely notice. If it takes 1-2 seconds,
it's a big stutter, where keyboard auto-repeat when moving around really
hurts (ie I don't see how it moves).

If it takes 5+ seconds, it feels really bad, and as if the whole email
client had just died.

Yeah, it's a nasty test.

Linus


\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2009-04-05 00:19    [from the cache]
©2003-2011 Jasper Spaans