Messages in this thread | | | Date | Sat, 4 Apr 2009 13:56:20 -0700 | From | Arjan van de Ven <> | Subject | Re: [GIT PULL] Ext3 latency fixes |
| |
On Sat, 4 Apr 2009 19:34:12 +0200 Jens Axboe <jens.axboe@oracle.com> wrote:
> > Latency is more important than throughput. It's that simple. > > It's really not that simple, otherwise the schedulers would be much > simpler. It's pretty easy to get good latency if you disregard any > throughput concerns,
I'd be very interested in a scheduler like that..... How much work would it be to make it ?
(if nothing else it would be a good number to have "should be within 50% of the perfect one for the tradeoff")
-- Arjan van de Ven Intel Open Source Technology Centre For development, discussion and tips for power savings, visit http://www.lesswatts.org
| |