lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2009]   [Apr]   [30]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
Patch in this message
/
Date
From
Subject[patch 18/88] x86, PAT, PCI: Change vma prot in pci_mmap to reflect inherited prot
2.6.28-stable review patch.  If anyone has any objections, please let us know.

------------------
From: Venkatesh Pallipadi <venkatesh.pallipadi@intel.com>

upstream commit: 9cdec049389ce2c324fd1ec508a71528a27d4a07

While looking at the issue in the thread:

http://marc.info/?l=dri-devel&m=123606627824556&w=2

noticed a bug in pci PAT code and memory type setting.

PCI mmap code did not set the proper protection in vma, when it
inherited protection in reserve_memtype. This bug only affects
the case where there exists a WC mapping before X does an mmap
with /proc or /sys pci interface. This will cause X userlevel
mmap from /proc or /sysfs to fail on fork.

Reported-by: Kevin Winchester <kjwinchester@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Venkatesh Pallipadi <venkatesh.pallipadi@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Suresh Siddha <suresh.b.siddha@intel.com>
Cc: Jesse Barnes <jbarnes@virtuousgeek.org>
Cc: Dave Airlie <airlied@redhat.com>
LKML-Reference: <20090323190720.GA16831@linux-os.sc.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
Signed-off-by: Chris Wright <chrisw@sous-sol.org>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@suse.de>
---
arch/x86/pci/i386.c | 3 +++
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)
--- a/arch/x86/pci/i386.c
+++ b/arch/x86/pci/i386.c
@@ -329,6 +329,9 @@ int pci_mmap_page_range(struct pci_dev *
return -EINVAL;
}
flags = new_flags;
+ vma->vm_page_prot = __pgprot(
+ (pgprot_val(vma->vm_page_prot) & ~_PAGE_CACHE_MASK) |
+ flags);
}

if (((vma->vm_pgoff < max_low_pfn_mapped) ||



\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2009-04-30 19:17    [from the cache]
©2003-2011 Jasper Spaans