lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2009]   [Apr]   [30]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
Patch in this message
/
Date
From
Subject[patch 06/88] xfrm: spin_lock() should be spin_unlock() in xfrm_state.c
2.6.28-stable review patch.  If anyone has any objections, please let us know.

------------------
From: Chuck Ebbert <cebbert@redhat.com>

[ Upstream commit 7d0b591c655ca0d72ebcbd242cf659a20a8995c5 ]

spin_lock() should be spin_unlock() in xfrm_state_walk_done().

caused by:
commit 12a169e7d8f4b1c95252d8b04ed0f1033ed7cfe2
"ipsec: Put dumpers on the dump list"

Reported-by: Marc Milgram <mmilgram@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Chuck Ebbert <cebbert@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>

---
net/xfrm/xfrm_state.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
--- a/net/xfrm/xfrm_state.c
+++ b/net/xfrm/xfrm_state.c
@@ -1601,7 +1601,7 @@ void xfrm_state_walk_done(struct xfrm_st

spin_lock_bh(&xfrm_state_lock);
list_del(&walk->all);
- spin_lock_bh(&xfrm_state_lock);
+ spin_unlock_bh(&xfrm_state_lock);
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL(xfrm_state_walk_done);




\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2009-04-30 19:13    [from the cache]
©2003-2011 Jasper Spaans