Messages in this thread | | | Date | Fri, 03 Apr 2009 17:21:47 -0700 | From | Corey Ashford <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH 6/6] perf_counter: kerneltop: output event support |
| |
As I was stealing code from kerneltop today to use in the PAPI profiling implementation, I ran across the code below:
Peter Zijlstra wrote: > Teach kerneltop about the new output ABI. > > XXX: anybody fancy integrating the PID/TID data into the output? > > Bump the mmap_data pages a little because we bloated the output and > have to be more careful about overruns with structured data. > > Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl> > --- [snip]
> > @@ -1147,28 +1152,75 @@ static void mmap_read(struct mmap_data * > unsigned int head = mmap_read_head(md); > unsigned int old = md->prev; > unsigned char *data = md->base + page_size; > + int diff; > > gettimeofday(&this_read, NULL); > > - if (head - old > md->mask) { > + /* > + * If we're further behind than half the buffer, there's a chance > + * the writer will bite our tail and screw up the events under us. > + * > + * If we somehow ended up ahead of the head, we got messed up. > + * > + * In either case, truncate and restart at head. > + */ > + diff = head - old; > + if (diff > md->mask / 2 || diff < 0) { > struct timeval iv; > unsigned long msecs; > > timersub(&this_read, &last_read, &iv); > msecs = iv.tv_sec*1000 + iv.tv_usec/1000; > > - fprintf(stderr, "WARNING: failed to keep up with mmap data. Last read %lu msecs ago.\n", msecs); > + fprintf(stderr, "WARNING: failed to keep up with mmap data." > + " Last read %lu msecs ago.\n", msecs); > [snip]
The test for diff < 0 looks incorrect to me. This shouldn't be an error, because it will frequently be the case that the head has wrapped around back to the beginning of the mmap'd pages, while old is near the end.
What it needs to find out, I think, is if the modulo distance between old and head is greater than 1/2 of the span of the mmap'd pages. Here's a suggested change:
- diff = head - old; + diff = (head - old) & md->mask; - if (diff > md->mask / 2 || diff < 0) { + if (diff > md->mask / 2) {
What do you think?
- Corey
| |