lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2009]   [Apr]   [3]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: Off topic: Numactl "distance" wrong
On Fri, Apr 03, 2009 at 02:43:32PM -0700, David Rientjes wrote:
> On Fri, 3 Apr 2009, Andi Kleen wrote:
>
> > > Who would be the right person (or list) to talk about this?
> >
> > Your BIOS vendor whose code reported the wrong values. Not that it matters
> > really on small systems.
> >
>
> The numactl --hardware values are coming directly from the sysfs per-node
> distance interface, so this may not be a result of erroneous BIOS data but
> rather the lack of a SLIT to describe the physical topology better.

That's the same really. Think about it. No SLIT on a NUMA system is a wrong
SLIT.

BTW there are more cases, like illegal slit which is also replaced
with 10/20.

-Andi


\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2009-04-03 23:55    [W:0.068 / U:0.384 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site