Messages in this thread |  | | Subject | Re: [PATCH 03/10] block: add rq->resid_len | | From | James Bottomley <> | | Date | Wed, 29 Apr 2009 09:41:54 -0500 |
| |
On Wed, 2009-04-29 at 18:13 +0900, Tejun Heo wrote: > rq->data_len served two purposes - the length of data buffer on issue > and the residual count on completion. This duality creates some > headaches. > > First of all, block layer and low level drivers can't really determine > what rq->data_len contains while a request is executing. It could be > the total request length or it coulde be anything else one of the > lower layers is using to keep track of residual count. This > complicates things because blk_rq_bytes() and thus > [__]blk_end_request_all() relies on rq->data_len for PC commands. > Drivers which want to report residual count should first cache the > total request length, update rq->data_len and then complete the > request with the cached data length. > > Secondly, it makes requests default to reporting full residual count, > ie. reporting that no data transfer occurred. The residual count is > an exception not the norm; however, the driver should clear > rq->data_len to zero to signify the normal cases while leaving it > alone means no data transfer occurred at all. This reverse default > behavior complicates code unnecessarily and renders block PC on some > drivers (ide-tape/floppy) unuseable. > > This patch adds rq->resid_len which is used only for residual count. > > While at it, remove now unnecessasry blk_rq_bytes() caching in > ide_pc_intr() as rq->data_len is not changed anymore. > > [ Impact: cleanup residual count handling, report 0 resid by default ]
This looks good (although I'd like to test it first).
Might it not be better to have an accessor setting resid_len? All the other patches in the series insulate users from the actual members of struct request by accessors, so this is a bit the odd man out.
James
|  |