Messages in this thread | | | Subject | Re: [git-pull -tip] x86: cpu_debug patches | From | Jaswinder Singh Rajput <> | Date | Wed, 29 Apr 2009 09:22:56 +0530 |
| |
On Tue, 2009-04-28 at 19:28 +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote: > * Jaswinder Singh Rajput <jaswinder@kernel.org> wrote: > > > @@ -850,10 +903,10 @@ static int cpu_init_cpu(void) > > cpui = &cpu_data(cpu); > > if (!cpu_has(cpui, X86_FEATURE_MSR)) > > continue; > > - per_cpu(cpu_model, cpu) = ((cpui->x86_vendor << 16) | > > - (cpui->x86 << 8) | > > - (cpui->x86_model)); > > - per_cpu(cpu_modelflag, cpu) = get_cpu_modelflag(cpu); > > + per_cpu(cpu_modelflag, cpu) = get_cpu_flag(cpui); > > + if (!per_cpu(cpu_modelflag, cpu)) > > + send_report(per_cpu(cpu_priv_count, cpu), cpui); > > This means that if the CPU is not enumerated in the model table > explicitly, we'll fall back to some really minimal output, right? >
Yes. -- JSR
| |