[lkml]   [2009]   [Apr]   [27]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: [PATCH 29/30] microblaze_mmu_v1: stat.h MMU update
On Monday 27 April 2009, Sam Ravnborg wrote:
> Why not use __u64/__u32 (and s32/s64 where appropriate)?
> Historical baggage or a techncal reason?

Yes, purely historical reasons: all architectures currently
use the simple C types rather than __u32 in stat.h.

I don't think it makes a difference either way, so I'd
leave it like this unless you find a good reason for

Arnd <><

 \ /
  Last update: 2009-04-27 14:41    [W:0.108 / U:2.716 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site