[lkml]   [2009]   [Apr]   [21]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: [PATCH 1/5] ftrace: use module notifier for function tracer
On Sun, 19 Apr 2009, Rusty Russell wrote:

> I think you need to do something else in general. Share the module_mutex for
> the ftrace code? The ksplice guys have a similar issue, so maybe we should
> generalize this into a "kernel_text" mutex?

Yes, a kernel_text mutex is on my list of things to propose once Ksplice
gets merged.

There are at present several systems that modify the kernel text after a
machine is booted (e.g. dynamic ftrace and toggling of smp_locks when
hotplugging a cpu). Currently, they avoid stepping on each other by only
making changes inside stop_machine.

However, Ksplice does its run-pre matching checks outside stop_machine,
and Ksplice needs a way to prevent e.g. dynamic ftrace from changing the
code out from under it between those checks and actually applying the
patches [1]. A kernel_text mutex would be a reasonable solution to this

-Tim Abbott

[1] At present this isn't a real problem because Ksplice and ftrace
conflict with each other for unrelated reasons.

 \ /
  Last update: 2009-04-21 19:59    [W:0.186 / U:5.252 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site