lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2009]   [Apr]   [21]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH 13/25] Inline __rmqueue_smallest()
On Tue, Apr 21, 2009 at 06:52:28PM +0900, KOSAKI Motohiro wrote:
> > Inline __rmqueue_smallest by altering flow very slightly so that there
> > is only one call site. This allows the function to be inlined without
> > additional text bloat.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Mel Gorman <mel@csn.ul.ie>
> > Reviewed-by: Christoph Lameter <cl@linux-foundation.org>
> > ---
> > mm/page_alloc.c | 23 ++++++++++++++++++-----
> > 1 files changed, 18 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/mm/page_alloc.c b/mm/page_alloc.c
> > index b13fc29..91a2cdb 100644
> > --- a/mm/page_alloc.c
> > +++ b/mm/page_alloc.c
> > @@ -665,7 +665,8 @@ static int prep_new_page(struct page *page, int order, gfp_t gfp_flags)
> > * Go through the free lists for the given migratetype and remove
> > * the smallest available page from the freelists
> > */
> > -static struct page *__rmqueue_smallest(struct zone *zone, unsigned int order,
> > +static inline
> > +struct page *__rmqueue_smallest(struct zone *zone, unsigned int order,
> > int migratetype)
>
> "only one caller" is one of keypoint of this patch, I think.
> so, commenting is better? but it isn't blocking reason at all.
>
> Reviewed-by: KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com>
>

Is this better?

Inline __rmqueue_smallest by altering flow very slightly so that there
is only one call site. Because there is only one call-site, this
function can then be inlined without causing text bloat.

I don't see a need to add a comment into the function itself as I don't
think it would help any.

--
Mel Gorman
Part-time Phd Student Linux Technology Center
University of Limerick IBM Dublin Software Lab


\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2009-04-21 12:13    [W:0.121 / U:0.028 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site