lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2009]   [Apr]   [20]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH 0/4] [GIT PULL] tracing: recursion and compile fixes
> > [   16.033417] Running tests again, along with the function tracer
> > [ 16.039141] Running tests on trace events:
> > [ 16.043063] Testing event kfree_skb: OK
> > [ 16.052521] Testing event kmalloc: OK
> > [ 16.061510] Testing event kmem_cache_alloc: OK
> > [ 16.071902] Testing event kmalloc_node: OK
> > [ 16.081756] Testing event kmem_cache_alloc_node: OK
> > [ 16.091759] Testing event kfree: OK
> > [ 16.100517] Testing event kmem_cache_free: OK
> > [ 16.110523] Testing event irq_handler_exit: OK
> > [ 16.120524] Testing event irq_handler_entry: OK
> > [ 16.130521] Testing event softirq_entry: OK
> > [ 16.139833] Testing event softirq_exit: OK
> > [ 16.149597] Testing event lock_acquired: OK
> > [ 16.160062] Testing event lock_acquire: OK
> > [ 16.171719] Testing event lock_release: <0>BUG: spinlock lockup on CPU#0, swapper/0, 80cd0240
> > [ 16.176013] Pid: 0, comm: swapper Not tainted 2.6.30-rc2-tip-01538-ge8201b9-dirty #34096
> > [ 16.176013] Call Trace:
> > [ 16.176013] [<80944340>] ? printk+0x15/0x1d
> > [ 16.176013] [<803a410a>] _raw_spin_lock+0x19a/0x1b0
> > [ 16.176013] [<80947bb7>] _spin_lock_irqsave+0x57/0x70
> > [ 16.176013] [<8012b2ca>] __wake_up+0x1a/0x50
> > [ 16.176013] [<8019392f>] trace_wake_up+0x2f/0x40
>
>
> The function tracer, used in the selftest, uses trace_current_buffer_unlock_commit
> which in turn calls trace_wake_up.
>
> The function tracer shouldn't call trace_wake_up() (might hold
> the rq lock already).
>
> I'm preparing a fix.
>

Hmm, doesn't the trace wakeup test if the runqueue lock is locked or not?

-- Steve



\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2009-04-20 22:21    [from the cache]
©2003-2011 Jasper Spaans