Messages in this thread | | | Date | Thu, 2 Apr 2009 17:02:57 -0700 | From | "Paul E. McKenney" <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH] v3 RCU: the bloatwatch edition |
| |
On Thu, Apr 02, 2009 at 03:44:44PM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote: > On Fri, 3 Apr 2009 00:36:05 +0200 > Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu> wrote: > > > > > Andrew, what do you think? > > I'm really struggling to see how the 900-odd bytes saved justifies > creating (yet another) variant of core kernel machinery. > > > A worry is yet another RCU variant - we already have 3. > > That would make four?
Three, once treercu is deemed stable enough to permit dropping Classic RCU.
Thanx, Paul
| |