lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2009]   [Apr]   [2]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
    /
    Date
    From
    SubjectRe: [RFC PATCH 00/17] virtual-bus
    Avi Kivity wrote:
    > Gregory Haskins wrote:
    >> Avi Kivity wrote:
    >>
    >>> My 'prohibitively expensive' is true only if you exit every packet.
    >>>
    >>>
    >>>
    >>
    >> Understood, but yet you need to do this if you want something like iSCSI
    >> READ transactions to have as low-latency as possible.
    >>
    >
    > Dunno, two microseconds is too much? The wire imposes much more.
    >

    No, but thats not what we are talking about. You said signaling on
    every packet is prohibitively expensive. I am saying signaling on every
    packet is required for decent latency. So is it prohibitively expensive
    or not?

    I think most would agree that adding 2us is not bad, but so far that is
    an unproven theory that the IO path in question only adds 2us. And we
    are not just looking at the rate at which we can enter and exit the
    guest...we need the whole path...from the PIO kick to the dev_xmit() on
    the egress hardware, to the ingress and rx-injection. This includes any
    and all penalties associated with the path, even if they are imposed by
    something like the design of tun-tap.

    Right now its way way way worse than 2us. In fact, at my last reading
    this was more like 3060us (3125-65). So shorten that 3125 to 67 (while
    maintaining line-rate) and I will be impressed. Heck, shorten it to
    80us and I will be impressed.

    -Greg

    [unhandled content-type:application/pgp-signature]
    \
     
     \ /
      Last update: 2009-04-02 15:37    [W:4.133 / U:0.116 seconds]
    ©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site