lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2009]   [Apr]   [15]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
From
SubjectRe: RFC: introduce struct ksymbol
Date
On Wed, 15 Apr 2009 03:28:39 pm Ingo Molnar wrote:
> Why not 'struct ksym'? That name is unused right now, it is shorter
> and just as descriptive.
>
> Regarding the change... dunno. Sam, Rusty - what do you think?

Yes, ksym is nice. But agree with you that it's marginal obfuscation
to wrap it in a struct.

The current symbol printing APIs are awful; we should address them first
(like the %pF patch does) IMHO.

Cheers,
Rusty.


\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2009-04-15 12:55    [W:0.342 / U:0.488 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site