Messages in this thread | | | From | Rusty Russell <> | Subject | Re: RFC: introduce struct ksymbol | Date | Wed, 15 Apr 2009 20:21:40 +0930 |
| |
On Wed, 15 Apr 2009 03:28:39 pm Ingo Molnar wrote: > Why not 'struct ksym'? That name is unused right now, it is shorter > and just as descriptive. > > Regarding the change... dunno. Sam, Rusty - what do you think?
Yes, ksym is nice. But agree with you that it's marginal obfuscation to wrap it in a struct.
The current symbol printing APIs are awful; we should address them first (like the %pF patch does) IMHO.
Cheers, Rusty.
| |