[lkml]   [2009]   [Apr]   [14]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: [Scst-devel] [ANNOUNCE]: Comparison of features sets between different SCSI targets (SCST, STGT, IET, LIO)

Tomasz Chmielewski, on 04/14/2009 03:07 PM wrote:
> Vladislav Bolkhovitin schrieb:
>>> Could anyone recheck if it's the same on some other system?
>>>> Which IO scheduler on the target did you use? I guess, deadline? If
>>>> so, you should try with CFQ as well.
>>> I used CFQ.
>> You didn't apply io_context-XXX.patch, correct? With it you should see a
>> noticeable increase, like in
> I didn't apply this one.
> I used 2.6.26.x kernel and io_context-XXX.patch was for 2.6.27, 2.6.28
> and 2.6.29 only; 2.6.27 fails to apply to kernel (perhaps in a
> trivial way, I didn't check).

Yes, io_context patch for 2.6.26.x kernels doesn't exist, because it
isn't clear if it has the necessary functionality.

But it's worth for you to upgrade to 2.6.27.x. Have you seen


 \ /
  Last update: 2009-04-14 20:13    [W:0.038 / U:4.036 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site