[lkml]   [2009]   [Apr]   [14]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: [PATCH] deal with interrupt shadow state for emulated instruction
Avi Kivity wrote:
> The comment about repeating 'mov ss' in the manual has that wonderful
> word in it, May. That means we're perfectly allowed to ignore it and
> just set the flag unconditionally.

Realistically, though, this should only be done for a limited number of
sequential instructions.

> I doubt we'll ever see a repeated 'mov ss', once is more than enough.

True enough, except maliciously.


H. Peter Anvin, Intel Open Source Technology Center
I work for Intel. I don't speak on their behalf.

 \ /
  Last update: 2009-04-14 18:11    [W:0.059 / U:13.280 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site