[lkml]   [2009]   [Apr]   [14]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: [RFC][PATCH v3 4/6] aio: Don't inherit aio ring memory at fork
KOSAKI Motohiro <> writes:

> AIO folks, Am I missing anything?
> ===============
> Subject: [RFC][PATCH] aio: Don't inherit aio ring memory at fork
> Currently, mm_struct::ioctx_list member isn't copyed at fork. IOW aio context don't inherit at fork.
> but only ring memory inherited. that's strange.
> This patch mark DONTFORK to ring-memory too.

Well, given that clearly nobody relies on io contexts being copied to
the child, I think it's okay to make this change. I think the current
behaviour violates the principal of least surprise, but I'm having a
hard time getting upset about that. ;)

> In addition, This patch has good side effect. it also fix
> "get_user_pages() vs fork" problem.

Hmm, I don't follow you, here. As I understand it, the get_user_pages
vs. fork problem has to do with the pages used for the actual I/O, not
the pages used to store the completion data. So, could you elaborate a
bit on what you mean by the above statement?

> I think "man fork" also sould be changed. it only say
> * The child does not inherit outstanding asynchronous I/O operations from
> its parent (aio_read(3), aio_write(3)).
> but aio_context_t (return value of io_setup(2)) also don't inherit in current implementaion.

I can certainly make that change, as I have other changes I need to push
to Michael, anyway.


 \ /
  Last update: 2009-04-14 18:05    [W:0.075 / U:31.992 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site