[lkml]   [2009]   [Apr]   [13]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
    SubjectRe: [PATCHSET pata-2.6] ide: rq->buffer, data, special and misc cleanups
    FUJITA Tomonori wrote:
    > On Tue, 31 Mar 2009 16:04:39 +0300
    > Boaz Harrosh <> wrote:
    >>> I
    >>> just don't think bvec should be used outside of block/fs interface.
    >>> As I wrote before, non-FS users have no reason to worry about bio.
    >>> All it should think about is the requst it needs to issue and the
    >>> memory area it's gonna use as in/out buffers. bio just doesn't have a
    >>> place there.
    >> I don't understand what happens to all the people that start to work on the block
    >> layer, they start getting defensive about bio being private to the request
    >> level. But the Genie is out of the bag already (I know cats and bottles).
    >> bio is already heavily used above the block layer from directly inside filesystems
    >> to all kind of raid engines, DM MD managers, multi paths, integrity information ...
    >> Because bio is exactly that Ideal page carrier you are talking about.
    > Wrong. multi path doesn't use bio. md accesses to the bio internal
    > (it's not nice) and has the own way to carry pages. dm has the own
    > mechanism on the top of bio. And bio doesn't work nicely for file
    > systems such as btrfs, which handle multiple devices.
    > Please stop your wrong argument 'bio is the ideal page carrier'.

    What is the multi-device problem with bio?

    The idea behind bio is to be the ideal page carrier :) It sounds like
    bio needs revision, not abandonment.


     \ /
      Last update: 2009-04-13 09:57    [W:0.023 / U:58.328 seconds]
    ©2003-2017 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site