[lkml]   [2009]   [Apr]   [13]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: [PATCH] slow_work_thread() should do the exclusive wait
Trond Myklebust <> wrote:

> Should that really be TASK_INTERRUPTIBLE? I don't see anything obvious
> in the enclosing for(;;) loop that checks for or handles signals...

If it were TASK_UNINTERRUPTIBLE, it would sit there in the D-state when not
doing anything. I must admit, I thought I was calling daemonize(), but that
seems to have got lost somewhere.


 \ /
  Last update: 2009-04-13 23:45    [W:0.063 / U:0.352 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site