[lkml]   [2009]   [Apr]   [13]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
    SubjectRe: [PATCH] slow_work_thread() should do the exclusive wait
    Trond Myklebust <> wrote:

    > Should that really be TASK_INTERRUPTIBLE? I don't see anything obvious
    > in the enclosing for(;;) loop that checks for or handles signals...

    If it were TASK_UNINTERRUPTIBLE, it would sit there in the D-state when not
    doing anything. I must admit, I thought I was calling daemonize(), but that
    seems to have got lost somewhere.


     \ /
      Last update: 2009-04-13 23:45    [W:0.017 / U:2.980 seconds]
    ©2003-2017 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site