[lkml]   [2009]   [Apr]   [13]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: [PATCH] netfilter: use per-cpu spinlock rather than RCU
On Mon, 13 Apr 2009, Stephen Hemminger wrote:

> This is an alternative version of ip/ip6/arp tables locking using
> per-cpu locks. This avoids the overhead of synchronize_net() during
> update but still removes the expensive rwlock in earlier versions.
> The idea for this came from an earlier version done by Eric Duzamet.
> Locking is done per-cpu, the fast path locks on the current cpu
> and updates counters. The slow case involves acquiring the locks on
> all cpu's.

Doesn't spin_lock() result in a pipeline flush on x86?

iirc there was a benchmark in an RCU paper that tested using per cpu
spin_locks and the result was that it didn't scale well at all.


 \ /
  Last update: 2009-04-13 21:37    [W:0.243 / U:1.048 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site