[lkml]   [2009]   [Apr]   [11]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
    SubjectRe: [PATCH 0/7] tracing: bug fixes for tracing/filters
    Tom Zanussi wrote:
    > Hi,
    > On Sat, 2009-04-11 at 15:52 +0800, Li Zefan wrote:
    >> This patchset fixes some bugs in tracing/filters. Most of the change
    >> goes to the last patch, and others are small ones.
    > At first glance, they look good and fix real problems - thanks for
    > fixing them. Re patch 7, there's been some discussion about using rcu
    > for this. See:

    Hm, I didn't notice it, since I just started looking into tracing/filters
    2 days ago.

    >>From that discussion, it seems some non-trivial changes to rcu would be
    > needed for this. I'm playing around with a different idea now to
    > hopefully avoid the need for that, or the other approach mentioned, of
    > temporarily stopping tracing while removing/changing the filters.
    > Basically my thought is to avoid the problem by not allocating or
    > destroying the preds when removing filters but instead switch out the
    > pred->fns with a nop version while keeping the fields intact for awhile.
    > I think that will work for removing filters, but I still need to think
    > about how it would (or would not) work for replacing them.

    I'll keep an eye on this issue.

     \ /
      Last update: 2009-04-11 12:11    [W:0.028 / U:49.668 seconds]
    ©2003-2016 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site