lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2009]   [Apr]   [11]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: General protection fault when unloading snd_hda_intel on 2.6.30-rc1+
On Sat, 11 Apr 2009 23:03:36 +0200
"Carlos R. Mafra" <crmafra2@gmail.com> wrote:

> From: "Carlos R. Mafra" <crmafra2@gmail.com>
> To: Arjan van de Ven <arjan@infradead.org>
> Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, tiwai@suse.de,
> alsa-devel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: General protection fault when
> unloading snd_hda_intel on 2.6.30-rc1+ Date: Sat, 11 Apr 2009
> 23:03:36 +0200 User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.18 (2008-05-17)
>
> On Sat 11.Apr'09 at 13:20:33 -0700, Arjan van de Ven wrote:
> [...]


asm volatile("bt %2,%1\n\t"
*ffffffff8044bf90: 0f a3 77 20 bt %esi,0x20(%rdi) | %edi = 697665646632785c %esi = 5 <--- faulting instruction
ffffffff8044bf94: 19 c0 sbb %eax,%eax
static struct input_handler *input_table[8];

static inline int is_event_supported(unsigned int code,
unsigned long *bm, unsigned int max)
{
return code <= max && test_bit(code, bm);
ffffffff8044bf96: 85 c0 test %eax,%eax
ffffffff8044bf98: 74 e0 je ffffffff8044bf7a <input_event+0x2a>
{
unsigned long flags;

if (is_event_supported(type, dev->evbit, EV_MAX)) {




so... "dev" is pointing evbit at... 697665646632785 which looks like grabage.

--
Arjan van de Ven Intel Open Source Technology Centre
For development, discussion and tips for power savings,
visit http://www.lesswatts.org


\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2009-04-11 23:41    [W:0.591 / U:0.304 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site