[lkml]   [2009]   [Mar]   [9]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: [patch] Re: scheduler oddity [bug?]
Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Tue, 2009-03-10 at 00:30 +1030, David Newall wrote:
>> Wasn't it reported to be caused by an off-by-one bug in commit
>> 38736f475071b80b66be28af7b44c854073699cc?
> Completely different issue. Unfortunate interference of effects though.

And yet, there *is* a bug in that commit, being, as I explained, that it
won't return a task if it's the last entry in the list, which seems
quite likely immediately after a fork. Has my patch been tried?

 \ /
  Last update: 2009-03-10 01:23    [W:0.040 / U:37.800 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site