[lkml]   [2009]   [Mar]   [9]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: [patch] Re: scheduler oddity [bug?]
On Mon, 2009-03-09 at 12:04 +0100, Peter Zijlstra wrote:

> OK, talked a bit with Ingo, the reason you're doing is that avg_overlap
> can easily grow stale.. I can see that happen indeed.
> So the 'perfect' thing would be a task-runtime decay, barring that the
> preemption thing seems a sane enough hart-beat of a task.
> How does the below look to you?

Other than the fact that the test for sync reject is currently
avg_overlap > sysctl_sched_migration_cost, looks fine to me. Having it
capped at the boundary is probably the better way to go.


 \ /
  Last update: 2009-03-09 14:19    [W:0.066 / U:4.736 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site