[lkml]   [2009]   [Mar]   [8]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
    SubjectRe: [PATCH 02/11] sdhci: Add support for bus-specific IO memory accessors
    On Wed, 4 Mar 2009 20:46:58 +0300
    Anton Vorontsov <> wrote:

    > On Sat, Feb 21, 2009 at 04:57:57PM +0100, Pierre Ossman wrote:
    > >
    > > We can most likely do some micro-optimisation do make the compare part
    > > cheaper, but the point was to avoid a function call for all the
    > > properly implemented controllers out there. We could have a flag so
    > > that it only has to check host->flags, which will most likely be in the
    > > cache anyway.
    > >
    > > Overhead for eSDHC is not a concern in my book, what is interesting is
    > > how much this change slows things down for other controllers.
    > OK, I see. Will the patch down below make you a little bit more happy
    > wrt normal controllers? Two #ifdefs, but then there is absolutely
    > zero overhead for the fully compliant SDHCI controllers.

    I can't say this makes me happy either, but I think it's acceptable for
    now so that we can move forward. I'd like a common code path for this
    thing, but I think I'm going to have to put a bit more time into it
    myself than I currently have available.

    > (So far it's just on top of this series, but I can incorporate it
    > into the "sdhci: Add support for bus-specific IO memory accessors"
    > patch, if you like).

    Please do. Have one patch add some code and another remove it in the
    same set is just silly. :)

    -- Pierre Ossman

    WARNING: This correspondence is being monitored by the
    Swedish government. Make sure your server uses encryption
    for SMTP traffic and consider using PGP for end-to-end
    [unhandled content-type:application/pgp-signature]
     \ /
      Last update: 2009-03-08 15:11    [W:0.021 / U:75.104 seconds]
    ©2003-2017 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site