Messages in this thread | | | Date | Sun, 8 Mar 2009 14:56:34 -0400 | Subject | Re: doubt about path_walk() function | From | Mhayk Whandson <> |
| |
Thanks Peter.
On Sun, Mar 8, 2009 at 2:11 PM, Peter Hallberg <hallberg68@hotmail.com> wrote: > >> linuxshield/scan.c|998| error: implicit declaration of function ‘path_walk’ >> Searching in the internet, I can see that this function was removed in >> one some kernel version, so how can I fix this problem ? > > It has been replaced with vfs_path_lookup, the fix for another fs looks like this: > - ret = path_walk(cachename, &nd); > + ret = vfs_path_lookup(nnpfsp->cachedir, nnpfsp->cacheroot, > + cachename, > + flags & O_CREAT ? LOOKUP_PARENT : 0, > + &nd); > > > _________________________________________________________________ > Dela foton på ett smidigt sätt med Windows Live™ Photos. > http://www.microsoft.com/windows/windowslive/products/photos.aspx-- > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in > the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org > More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html > Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/ >
-- Mhayk Whandson Linux User #413723 E-mail: eu@mhayk.com.br -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |