Messages in this thread | | | Date | Sat, 07 Mar 2009 18:59:28 +0200 | From | Thanasis <> | Subject | Re: jffs2 and kernel config for SDHC Memory Cards |
| |
on 03/07/2009 12:57 AM Sitsofe Wheeler wrote the following: > On Fri, Mar 06, 2009 at 10:24:25PM +0200, Thanasis wrote: >> on 03/06/2009 08:24 PM Sitsofe Wheeler wrote the following: >>> On Fri, Mar 06, 2009 at 03:56:01PM +0200, Thanasis wrote: >>>> on 03/06/2009 03:39 PM Thanasis wrote the following: >>>>> I want to use two of these Transcend’s Class 6 SDHC (SD High-Capacity) >>>>> Memory Cards, >>>>> http://www.transcendusa.com/Products/ModDetail.asp?ModNo=147&LangNo=0&Func1No=1&Func2No=13 >>>>> as part of the filesystem in a netbook (Acer A110L), will mount /home on >>>>> one, and /tmp and /var on the other. >>> >>>> Let me rephrase my questions in order to be clearer: >>>> Q1: In order to achieve wear leveling should I format them as jffs2? >>> This probably won't be very effective as you are already past the > >> OK. I believe I should stick to ext2, right? > > If you mean compared to jffs2 then probably yes, better to stick with > ext2. Right, that is what I meant.
If you mean is ext2 the best choice over anything else... well > that's an open question (or so I'm told). You would need to ask a > filesystem expert really but it apparently depends on the workload, the > characteristics of the "disks" and whether you need journaling. It is going to be a desktop (netbook) system, so, if it had a HDD, I would opt for ext4 or xfs, but given the hardware (SDHC), I guess ext2 is the best choice. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |