lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2009]   [Mar]   [6]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
From
Date
SubjectRe: Future of md multipath
On Thursday March 5, madduck@debian.org wrote:
> also sprach Neil Brown <neilb@suse.de> [2009.03.05.0349 +0100]:
> > I'm in favour of deprecating it. Whenever I hear of people using it I
> > suggest dm-multipath, but there could people I don't here about.
> > I think the upcoming mdadm-3.0 will need a compile-time option to
> > enable multipath, so people will only get it if they really really
> > want it.
>
> How do you propose a distro to deal with this? Keep it enabled for
> a certain time (with a deprecation warning?) and then just to close
> the doors on users who still need it?
>
> How long will you support it after deprecation?
>
> I understand that dm-multipath is more favourable, but unless
> there's a riskless way to convert mdadm multipath into dm-multipath
> on old systems, I don't think we have the option of deprecating it,
> unless deprecation lasts for several years.

Always the practical one, aren't you :-)

I wonder how hard it would be to get mdadm to assemble a multipath
using the 'dm' code rather than the 'md' code....
Or to get the md layer in the kernel to hook in to the dm multipath
implementation.

I think it is probably worth putting in a printk now to say "You
should probably be using dm-multipath". But we probably do need to
leave the code there for a while longer..

NeilBrown


\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2009-03-06 06:35    [W:1.179 / U:0.172 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site