Messages in this thread Patch in this message | | | Subject | [PATCH] lockdep: remove extra "irq" string | From | Peter Zijlstra <> | Date | Wed, 04 Mar 2009 14:59:52 +0100 |
| |
Subject: lockdep: remove extra "irq" string From: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl> Date: Wed Mar 04 14:53:24 CET 2009
print_irq_inversion_bug() gets handed state strings of the form
"HARDIRQ", "SOFTIRQ", "RECLAIM_FS"
and appends "-irq-{un,}safe" to them, which is either redudant for *IRQ or confusing in the RECLAIM_FS case.
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl> --- kernel/lockdep.c | 4 ++-- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
Index: linux-2.6/kernel/lockdep.c =================================================================== --- linux-2.6.orig/kernel/lockdep.c +++ linux-2.6/kernel/lockdep.c @@ -1901,9 +1901,9 @@ print_irq_inversion_bug(struct task_stru curr->comm, task_pid_nr(curr)); print_lock(this); if (forwards) - printk("but this lock took another, %s-irq-unsafe lock in the past:\n", irqclass); + printk("but this lock took another, %s-unsafe lock in the past:\n", irqclass); else - printk("but this lock was taken by another, %s-irq-safe lock in the past:\n", irqclass); + printk("but this lock was taken by another, %s-safe lock in the past:\n", irqclass); print_lock_name(other); printk("\n\nand interrupts could create inverse lock ordering between them.\n\n");
| |