lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2009]   [Mar]   [4]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
Patch in this message
/
Subject[PATCH] lockdep: remove extra "irq" string
From
Date
Subject: lockdep: remove extra "irq" string
From: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
Date: Wed Mar 04 14:53:24 CET 2009

print_irq_inversion_bug() gets handed state strings of the form

"HARDIRQ", "SOFTIRQ", "RECLAIM_FS"

and appends "-irq-{un,}safe" to them, which is either redudant for *IRQ or
confusing in the RECLAIM_FS case.

Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
---
kernel/lockdep.c | 4 ++--
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

Index: linux-2.6/kernel/lockdep.c
===================================================================
--- linux-2.6.orig/kernel/lockdep.c
+++ linux-2.6/kernel/lockdep.c
@@ -1901,9 +1901,9 @@ print_irq_inversion_bug(struct task_stru
curr->comm, task_pid_nr(curr));
print_lock(this);
if (forwards)
- printk("but this lock took another, %s-irq-unsafe lock in the past:\n", irqclass);
+ printk("but this lock took another, %s-unsafe lock in the past:\n", irqclass);
else
- printk("but this lock was taken by another, %s-irq-safe lock in the past:\n", irqclass);
+ printk("but this lock was taken by another, %s-safe lock in the past:\n", irqclass);
print_lock_name(other);
printk("\n\nand interrupts could create inverse lock ordering between them.\n\n");




\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2009-03-04 15:03    [W:0.041 / U:0.932 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site