lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2009]   [Mar]   [31]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [RFC][PATCH] memcg soft limit (yet another new design) v1
* KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com> [2009-03-31 08:55:38]:

> On Sat, 28 Mar 2009 23:57:47 +0530
> Balbir Singh <balbir@linux.vnet.ibm.com> wrote:
>
> > * Balbir Singh <balbir@linux.vnet.ibm.com> [2009-03-28 23:41:00]:
> >
> > > * KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com> [2009-03-27 13:59:33]:
> > >
> > > > ==brief test result==
> > > > On 2CPU/1.6GB bytes machine. create group A and B
> > > > A. soft limit=300M
> > > > B. no soft limit
> > > >
> > > > Run a malloc() program on B and allcoate 1G of memory. The program just
> > > > sleeps after allocating memory and no memory refernce after it.
> > > > Run make -j 6 and compile the kernel.
> > > >
> > > > When vm.swappiness = 60 => 60MB of memory are swapped out from B.
> > > > When vm.swappiness = 10 => 1MB of memory are swapped out from B
> > > >
> > > > If no soft limit, 350MB of swap out will happen from B.(swapiness=60)
> > > >
> > >
> > > I ran the same tests, booted the machine with mem=1700M and maxcpus=2
> > >
> > > Here is what I see with
> >
> > I meant to say, Here is what I see with my patches (v7)
> >
> Hmm, I saw 250MB of swap out ;) As I reported before.

Swapout for A? For A it is expected, but for B it is not. How many
nodes do you have on your machine? Any fake numa nodes?

--
Balbir


\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2009-03-31 07:05    [W:0.160 / U:0.248 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site