[lkml]   [2009]   [Mar]   [29]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectClass device namespaces
Hi Greg,

I am a little confused by the directories created when one registers a
class device. When a class device is registered as the children of a
real device, a subdirectory by the class name is created, and the class
device is created there, effectively granting each class a separate
namespace. Example:


where 0000:00:1f.3 is the physical device, i2c-adapter the class name
and i2c-0 the class device.

OTOH, if I create a class device as the children of another class
device, the class device is created directly, without a directory
between the parent and the child. Example:


where the first i2c-0 is an i2c-adapter class device, and the second
i2c-0 is an i2c-dev class device. I would have expected:


The current behavior seems inconsistent to me. Is it done so on purpose,
or is this accidental? If on purpose, what's the reason?

I am asking because this is causing trouble in practice. We have both
i2c-dev and firmware_class which try to create class devices by the
same name and this of course collides. While I would blame
firmware_class for coming up with an horrible naming scheme (or
actually, for not coming up with any naming scheme) it might still be a
good idea to prevent such collisions at the driver core level.

Jean Delvare

 \ /
  Last update: 2009-03-29 17:51    [W:0.060 / U:10.212 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site