Messages in this thread | | | Date | Fri, 27 Mar 2009 01:30:40 +0100 | From | Pavel Machek <> | Subject | Re: TOMOYO in linux-next |
| |
On Fri 2009-03-27 11:15:28, James Morris wrote: > On Thu, 26 Mar 2009, Pavel Machek wrote: > > > Hi! > > > > I don't think merging that is good idea. > > It's already merged in Linus' tree.
Too bad.
> > Security should be doable > > without making shell-like glob matching... > > The TOMOYO developers have already responded to your feedback on this > issue. It's also an inherent aspect of pathname security, an issue which > has been resolved in favour of inclusion in the kernel.
Do you have any references? My memory claims otherwise on this.
> As for the rest of the feedback, please work with the developers to fix > any bugs or lack of documentation.
Which brings a question: given that kernel<->user interface is undocumented, how was this reviewed? Pavel -- (english) http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek (cesky, pictures) http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~pavel/picture/horses/blog.html
| |