lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2009]   [Mar]   [25]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
    /
    SubjectRE: [PATCH 2/5] mm: remove unlikly NULL from kfree
    From
    Date
    On Wed, 2009-03-25 at 01:02 -0700, Hua Zhong wrote:
    > > But those are _error handling paths_ (at least supposed to be). I
    > > wonder which call-sites are responsible for this. Can frtrace help us
    > > here?
    >
    > I am not sure why you call these error paths.
    >
    > I submitted the same patch two years ago, and you are still holding the same
    > argument.
    >
    > http://www.archivum.info/linux.kernel/2006-04/msg06042.html
    >
    > Have you used likely profiler? These are real numbers. If you insist on
    > calling them error paths then error paths are obviously the norm.

    I am not denying the results, I am just saying that they don't make much
    sense to me. Like I said, I would love to see the actual call-sites to
    prove my argument wrong.

    Pekka



    \
     
     \ /
      Last update: 2009-03-25 09:09    [W:0.022 / U:180.440 seconds]
    ©2003-2016 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site