[lkml]   [2009]   [Mar]   [24]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
    SubjectRe: [RFC] Correct behaviour of irq affinity?
    Rusty Russell wrote:
    > On Wednesday 25 March 2009 11:03:08 Rusty Russell wrote:
    >> On Tuesday 24 March 2009 23:09:37 Eric W. Biederman wrote:
    >>> cpu_mask_to_apic_id do not take cpu_online_map into account and should
    >>> probably be fixed. flat_cpu_mask_to_apicid was the one I could find.
    >> Also the numaq apic.h. I'll do an audit and send a patch.
    > Actually, numaq is just weird, so I'll assume it's correct. I couldn't
    > find any others.
    >> Yes, agree with Yinghai's fix. I'll re-spin my patch on top of his.
    > But he already did it while I slept in.

    waiting for ingo to put that three into tip/master:

    [PATCH 1/3] x86: fix set_extra_move_desc calling
    [PATCH 2/3] x86: use default_cpu_mask_to_apicid for 64bit
    [PATCH 3/3] x86: Correct behaviour of irq affinity -v2


     \ /
      Last update: 2009-03-25 02:07    [W:0.021 / U:5.272 seconds]
    ©2003-2016 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site