lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2009]   [Mar]   [24]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH 01/10] Documentation
> From: Vivek Goyal <vgoyal@redhat.com>
> Date: Tue, Mar 24, 2009 02:29:06PM -0400
>
...
> > Does keeping the sync queue in ready tree solves the problem too? Is
> > it because it avoid a virtual time jump?
> >
>
> I have not tried the second approch yet. But that also should solve the
> vtime jump issue.
>

Do you mean that you intend to keep a queue with no backlog in the
active tree?


\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2009-03-24 19:35    [W:0.310 / U:0.176 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site