lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2009]   [Mar]   [23]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
SubjectRe: [PATCH] degrade severity of lockdep printk
From
Date
On Mon, 2009-03-23 at 16:28 -0400, Kyle McMartin wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 23, 2009 at 09:20:54PM +0100, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> >
> > Please report it in that case and get us to increase the limit.
> >
>
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=489563
>
> Although I don't really see how this can be particularly fixed, since
> any workload that allocates a struct with a lock, initializes, and then
> eventually frees it a whole bunch of times will run out of lock_lists
> won't it?

Not if the lock init site doesn't change. Modules are the big exception,
cycling modules will run you out of lockdep space..



\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2009-03-23 21:35    [from the cache]
©2003-2011 Jasper Spaans