lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2009]   [Mar]   [23]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
Patch in this message
/
Date
From
Subject[tip:sched/urgent] sched, ptrace: fix UML and ptrace slowness
Commit-ID:  84eef8ca758fa4a68c29f7d752376f6ca6872383
Gitweb: http://git.kernel.org/tip/84eef8ca758fa4a68c29f7d752376f6ca6872383
Author: Miklos Szeredi <miklos@szeredi.hu>
AuthorDate: Mon, 23 Mar 2009 16:07:24 +0100
Committer: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
CommitDate: Mon, 23 Mar 2009 17:37:38 +0100

sched, ptrace: fix UML and ptrace slowness

This patch fixes bug #12208:

Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12208
Subject : uml is very slow on 2.6.28 host

This turned out to be not a scheduler regression, but an already
existing problem in ptrace being triggered by subtle scheduler
changes.

The problem is this:

- task A is ptracing task B
- task B stops on a trace event
- task A is woken up and preempts task B
- task A calls ptrace on task B, which does ptrace_check_attach()
- this calls wait_task_inactive(), which sees that task B is still on the runq
- task A goes to sleep for a jiffy
- ...

Since UML does lots of the above sequences, those jiffies quickly add
up to make it slow as hell.

This patch solves this by not rescheduling in read_unlock() after
ptrace_stop() has woken up the tracer.

Thanks to Oleg Nesterov and Ingo Molnar for the feedback.

Signed-off-by: Miklos Szeredi <mszeredi@suse.cz>
Cc: oleg@redhat.com
Cc: peterz@infradead.org
Cc: roland@redhat.com
Cc: efault@gmx.de
Cc: rjw@sisk.pl
Cc: jdike@addtoit.com
Cc: user-mode-linux-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
Cc: torvalds@linux-foundation.org
Cc: akpm@linux-foundation.org
Cc: <stable@kernel.org>
LKML-Reference: <E1LllkK-0000zF-1h@pomaz-ex.szeredi.hu>
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>


---
kernel/signal.c | 8 ++++++++
1 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)

diff --git a/kernel/signal.c b/kernel/signal.c
index 2a74fe8..1c88144 100644
--- a/kernel/signal.c
+++ b/kernel/signal.c
@@ -1575,7 +1575,15 @@ static void ptrace_stop(int exit_code, int clear_code, siginfo_t *info)
read_lock(&tasklist_lock);
if (may_ptrace_stop()) {
do_notify_parent_cldstop(current, CLD_TRAPPED);
+ /*
+ * Don't want to allow preemption here, because
+ * sys_ptrace() needs this task to be inactive.
+ *
+ * XXX: implement read_unlock_no_resched().
+ */
+ preempt_disable();
read_unlock(&tasklist_lock);
+ preempt_enable_no_resched();
schedule();
} else {
/*

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2009-03-23 17:45    [W:0.060 / U:0.060 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site