[lkml]   [2009]   [Mar]   [21]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: [PATCH 3/3] utrace-based ftrace "process" engine, v2

On Sat, 21 Mar 2009, Frank Ch. Eigler wrote:
> > If testing utrace against its main application requires installation
> > of a complete enterprise distro from a distro [...]
> This has *never* been a requirement.

You guys are getting off a tangent.

Let's go back to the post that started this all.

> The thing is, utrace crashes in Fedora have dominated
> for many months, so i'm not sure what to make of the idea of posting
> a 4000+ lines of core kernel code patchset on the last day of the
> development cycle, a posting that has carefully avoided the Cc:-ing
> of affected maintainers ;-)

.. and dammit, I agree 100%. If utrace really shows up in _any_ way on, then I think THE ENTIRE DISCUSSION in this thread is moot.

I'm not going to take known-bad crap. It's that simple. Don't bother
posting it, don't bother discussing it, don't bother making excuses for


 \ /
  Last update: 2009-03-21 23:11    [W:0.081 / U:25.892 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site