[lkml]   [2009]   [Mar]   [20]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: Nasal demons in preprocessor use (Re: [PATCH] test-suite: new preprocessor test case)
On Sat, Mar 21, 2009 at 12:16:17AM +0100, Vegard Nossum wrote:

> (The solution you sketched is still quite an uglification of the
> original code, something we tried to minimize using the construct you
> saw.)

Frankly, I'd suggest expanding that sucker and being done with that.
However, more interesting question is whether you really need the
named field to be a struct. If not, something like
would work just fine, without all that fun.

 \ /
  Last update: 2009-03-21 00:47    [W:0.088 / U:1.468 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site